Most Asked Questions about Refund Anticipation Loans (RAL)

What You Should Know About Tax Refund Anticipation Loans

On January 29, 2024, taxpayers will welcome the opening of tax season with mixed emotions. Some eagerly anticipate tax refunds, while others bear the weight of anxiety. In such situations, some taxpayers resort to seeking refund anticipation loans (RALs). Understanding the workings of these loans and the potential disqualifications is crucial. Here’s what you need to know.

Offered by certain tax preparers, an RAL (Refund Anticipation Loan) is a type of loan that taxpayers can opt for if they are anticipating a tax refund. It’s worth noting that this loan must be repaid, as it falls under a contractual agreement. By entering into an agreement with a lender, usually a bank, individuals can receive an advance on their projected tax refund in exchange for a commitment to repay the loan. One of the main advantages of an Refund Anticipation Loans RAL is quick access to cash, even if the tax refund itself is not disbursed for several weeks.

As Monday ushers in the start of tax season, receiving your tax refund immediately might not be possible. The law stipulates that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) must wait until mid-February to distribute refunds to those who claim the Earned-Income Tax Credit (EITC) or the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC).

Refund Anticipation Loans

Considering typical processing times for banks, as well as weekends and the upcoming President’s Day holiday, it is anticipated that the earliest refunds related to EITC and ACTC will be accessible on February 29, 2024. This is, of course, assuming that the refunds are made through direct deposit without any complications. Is worth mentioning that February 29, 2024, marks the final weekday of February. It is important to note that the recording on the IRS phone line advises taxpayers to expect these specific refunds to become available starting from the initial week of March.

In the process of facilitating RALs, the IRS maintains a clear separation. Lenders are not supplied with information by the IRS, nor are taxpayer tax refund amounts guaranteed. Consequently, every year, I am bombarded with inquiries regarding RALs.

Here’s a quick rundown of some of the most common, together with my answers:

If RAL was denied, does that mean I won’t get my tax refund?

Despite being coordinated or completed at the same location, keeping the Refund Anticipation Loans (RAL) application separate from the tax return preparation is necessary. Turning down the RAL will not impact your eligibility for a tax refund, as it will still be payable to you even if you have yet to receive any funds from the lender.

However, it is important to note that you might still find yourself responsible for various fees associated with loan applications, such as credit check fees and miscellaneous fees. This is a crucial aspect to consider when searching for a reliable RAL provider, as some may prioritize earning revenue from these charges rather than genuinely assisting you in obtaining the loan.

Why would I be denied of RAL?

When it comes to getting turned down for an RAL, there are a variety of factors that could come into play. One of the most frequent causes of this rejection is the lender deeming you too much of a risk.

When considering the size of your tax refund, you must be optimistic that it will cover the loan once interest rates, fees, and tax preparation fees are deducted. Otherwise, you must rely on your finances to cover the remaining amount. Furthermore, alterations in tax laws and offsets, where the government reduces your refund due to outstanding debts like child support or student loans, can impact your overall financial situation.

The lenders, banks, and tax preparers are now in the dark when it comes to the IRS, no longer providing them with the much-needed “debt indicator.” This indicator is used to give them an advanced heads-up on whether your refund had any portions earmarked for offset. With this crucial information gone, it becomes increasingly more work for lenders to gauge your bottom line accurately. As a result, they now have to rely on alternative criteria such as your credit history or salary to decide on whether to grant you a loan.

My Refund Anticipation Loan status says “Your application has been received but has not been accepted at this time.” What’s going on?

An RAL is subject to the lender’s due diligence requirements as with any loan. The level of due diligence may vary depending on the lender, ranging from a simple credit check to a more extensive process, particularly for larger loan amounts. If it has been several days since your application, it is worth seeking an update from the lender or the tax preparer who facilitated the loan.

Got denied for an RAL, will I got my tax papers back?

You can expect to have your documents returned to you, but the timing may vary. Your tax preparer may have a specific schedule for sending out copies of tax returns, and yours might simply not have been sent out yet.
In the event that this scenario arises, it would be wise to provide the individual in question with a brief period of time before taking further action. Nonetheless, it is within your rights to insist on promptly returning your information forms if the tax preparer fails to complete the necessary preparations. To learn additional strategies for handling an uncooperative preparer, get in touch with your dedicated Tax Professional to help you from start to finish.

RAL: Refund Anticipation Loan

For quite some time, commercial tax preparers have been providing what is known as a refund anticipation loan (RAL) to taxpayers for the purpose of providing them with their refund check quickly–usually within one or two days. The RAL requires consumers to make up-front payments in the form of interest. Many of these people also received the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).

In 2010, the Internal Revenue Service voiced its decision to discontinue the “debt indicator” service; this had been a tool utilized by tax preparers to determine whether or not a taxpayer’s refund would be used towards paying any outstanding debts such as back taxes, child support and/or student loan fees.

Subsequently, several banking institutions stopped offering RALs, and in response to this trend, federal banking regulators mandated the termination of their issuance. These so-called “unsafe or unsound” loans could not be repaid from tax refunds utilized to cover other financial obligations.

The National Consumer Law Center and the Consumer Federation of America found that every year, up to $1 billion was taken from the tax refunds of over 10 million individuals in fees associated with RAL loans. In 2013, 100,000 Americans applied for a Refund Anticipation Loan (RAL), yet by 2014, this number had plummeted by over half.

RapidTax free dedicated Tax Professionals will walk you though the RAL filing process from start to finish to maximize your chances of getting your RAL issued as soon as possible.

Refund Anticipation Loan

Substitute RALs

No longer offered by banks, Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs) remain an option for certain lower-income taxpayers at tax time. Although financial institutions originally provided these loans, some tax preparers have turned to alternative lenders, such as payday lenders in order to furnish them instead. Although various tax return options can be marketed as alternatives to Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs), these products often incur higher fees than RALs. An increasingly appealing option, however, is filing for an early refund with paystub information instead of waiting on W-2 documents.

Following the introduction of refund delays in 2017, another type of RAL became more prevalent. Known as “no-fee” RALs, they are typically provided by paid preparers – although the various fees associated with them aren’t usually made known at first.

Compared to other credit options, Refund Anticipation Loan (RALs) offer a less risky option for tax filers since they are not mandated to repay the loan if their actual refund does not match the amount predicted by their preparer. Last year, research conducted by the National Consumer Law Center revealed that over 1.6 million no fee RAL were distributed.

Refund Anticipation Checks

As an alternative to refund anticipation loans (RALs), a growing number of tax preparers are turning to refund anticipation checks (RACs). Although these present less risk to the preparer, they can be costly for the taxpayer, with higher fees associated. With RACs, the IRS is able to directly transfer a tax filer’s refund into a temporary bank account opened by the tax preparer.

Prior to the taxpayer obtaining their refund, fees for tax preparation as well as RACs are deducted. Generally, federal refunds charge between $25-$60 in RAC charges, and state refunds cost $10 (with possible extra check-cashing fees).

In 2015, nearly 20 million taxpayers – most of whom claimed the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) – received a Refund Anticipation Check at an expenditure of about $475 million. This was higher than 2011’s figure of 18.4 million and 2009’s 12.9 million taxpayers. Alarmingly, the rate of RAC usage is not reduced, even though free tax programs can grant refunds within the same timeframe via direct deposit.

State Regulations for Refund Anticipation Loans

In comparison with federal regulations, certain states have enforced more substantial standards for refund anticipation loans (RALs). For example, many states have barred tax preparers from charging additional fees only to those individuals taking out RALs or RACs and specified the kinds of companies allowed to offer these advances. Moreover, when states imposed limits on the high APR that usually surpasses 100 percent for RALs, lawsuits were brought up against them.

In 2008, the Attorneys General of California and New Jersey took legal action against tax preparers for their deceptive advertising practices concerning Refund Anticipation Loans. According to the National Consumer Law Center, this was not an isolated incident; states across the nation have implemented regulations surrounding RALs and are enforcing them through similar court proceedings.

In 2010, the New York State Division of Human Rights brought suit against certain tax preparers for discriminatory targeting. As a result, Maryland, Colorado, and Louisiana all implemented RAL legislation that same year. Maryland’s law prohibited most additional fees associated with RALs, while both Colorado and Louisiana increased disclosure standards related to the applications.

20 States Currently Regulating RALs:

  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Illinois
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Oregon
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Virginia
  • Washington State
  • Wisconsin